On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/2/3 Teodor Sigaev <teo...@sigaev.ru>: >>> Can you rename RED and BLACK to RBRED and RBBLACK? >> >> Yes, of course, done. >> >> Any objections to commit? > > I would like to see point #2 of the following email addressed before > commit. As things stand, it is not clear (at least to me) whether > this is a win. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02552.php
Specifically, on this web page: http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/wiki/2009-04-03 There is a section that begins with this line of text: Repeat test with 100,000 identical records varying array length (len). That test shows rbtree being a third slower than HEAD. But there's not enough information on that web page to replicate that test, so it's hard to speculate on what may be going wrong. I don't think we should commit this until we understand that. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
