On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm not sure whether allowing that would be good or bad. I see no >> obvious killer reason why it'd be bad, but it seems like the kind of >> thing we might regret someday. pg_global is in some sense an >> implementation artifact, so allowing users to depend on it might be >> bad in the long run. > > Agreed, it feels scary to allow it.
+1. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
