Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> There is a standard for this. CREATE DOMAIN shows CREATE DOMAIN. > > > OK, CVS changed to emit CREATE DOMAIN. > > What's standard about it? I count 9 existing statements that use > "CREATE", vs 4 that use "CREATE xxx". (And of those four, CREATE > VERSION is dead code...) The closest existing statement, CREATE > TYPE, emits "CREATE". > > Plain "CREATE" seems like the conforming choice, unless we'd like > to do a wholesale revision of existing command tags. Which is > not necessarily an unreasonable thing to do. But just making CREATE > DOMAIN emit "CREATE DOMAIN" isn't improving consistency at all.
I assumed Peter meant some kind of ANSI SQL standard, but I am kind of lost how they define that level of detail in the standard. I agree a wholesale cleanup there would be a good idea. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
