Fernando Nasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I am supposed to see if I can fix this and get rid of the "into"
> field in SelectStmt at the same time. Right Tom?
Yeah, we had talked about that ... but I'm not sure it's worth the
trouble. I don't see any clean way for the SELECT grammar rule to
return info about an INTO clause, other than by including it in
SelectStmt.
Probably the easiest answer is for CreateCommandTag to just deal with
drilling down into the parsetree to see if INTO appears.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
