Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes: > > We have an optimization to bulkload date in pg_restore, but the code > > only works in parallel restore (--jobs >= 2). Why don't we do the > > same optimization in the serial restore (--jobs = 1) ? > > The code is only trying to substitute for something you can't have > in parallel restore, ie --single-transaction.
Yeah, the comment says so. But it does not necessarily mean that we cannot optimize the copy also in non-single-transaction restore. The attached patch improve the judgment condition, I'll add it to the next commit-fest. Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center
restore-wal-skip_20100210.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
