On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > I'm a bit inclined to commit the piece of this patch that concerns the > warnings pragma, and leave the rest for the next release,
Based on the subsequent discussion on this thread, +1 for this approach. Allowing use warnings sounds good; opening a potential security hole sounds bad. Sounds like it would considerably simplify the patch, too. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
