On Monday 15 February 2010 14:50:03 marcin mank wrote: > Yes, the issue with initdb failing is unrelated (and I have no problem > about the fs being unsupported). But fsync still DOES fail on > directories from the mount. > > >> But I would not be that sure that eg. NFS or something like that won`t > >> complain. > > > > It does not. > > What if someone mounts a NFS share from a system that does not support > directory fsync (per buildfarm: unixware, AIX) on Linux? I agree that > this is asking for trouble, but... Then nothing. The fsync via nfs or such is a local operation. There is nothing like a "fsync" command transported - i.e. the fsync controls the local cache not the remote one...
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
