Boszormenyi Zoltan írta: > Michael Meskes írta: > >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:28:00PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: >> >> >>> I was trying to stress the *beta* status. Maybe someone into NetBSD might >>> be >>> interested in reporting this as a bug. At least it behaves different to all >>> other archs we have. >>> >>> >> Hmm, it seems the patch didn't work. Back to the drawing board. >> >> > > I hope the amd64 version of NetBSD 5.0.2 behaves similarly, > I can only try it as a VM guest... >
NetBSD 5.0.2/x86_64 passed all both the main and the ECPG "make check" tests. The BETA might have had a bug or NetBSD/MIPS has some quirks I can't solve. Now what? On a sidenote, this machine fails for the 8.4 STABLE tree, too, in the main "make check"... Is this buildfarm member for detecting bugs in the already obsolete NetBSD 5.0 BETA, or what? The final 5.0 and two bugfix releases are already out for a while. The owner of that particular machine should upgrade. Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi -- Bible has answers for everything. Proof: "But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology. "May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH http://www.postgresql.at/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
