(2010/03/03 11:22), Tom Lane wrote: > KaiGai Kohei<[email protected]> writes: >> Is it an expected behavior? > > There's no particular reason to forbid it, is there?
Perhaps, it is harmless. It just seemed to me the renameatt() was not implemented correctly according to the documentation. -- KaiGai Kohei <[email protected]> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
