(2010/03/03 11:22), Tom Lane wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei<kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>  writes:
>> Is it an expected behavior?
> 
> There's no particular reason to forbid it, is there?

Perhaps, it is harmless.

It just seemed to me the renameatt() was not implemented correctly
according to the documentation.
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to