(2010/03/11 23:55), Robert Haas wrote: > 2010/3/10 KaiGai Kohei<kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>: >> Indeed, it is useful to allow renaming attribute of composite types. >> >> However, it is also useless to allow to rename attribute of sequences, >> but harmless, like renames on indexes. It seems to me it is fair enough >> to allow renaming attributes of tables, views and composite types... > > I don't agree. I think users should be allowed to rename things they > had a hand in naming in the first place (and index columns fall into > that category, since the names are derived from table column names). > But changing system-assigned column names for sequences or toast > tables is just weird.
OK, the attached patch forbid to rename an attribute of relations except for tables, views, composite types and indexes. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>
pgsql-renameatt-check-relkind.2.patch
Description: application/octect-stream
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
