Dimitri Fontaine <dfonta...@hi-media.com> writes:
> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> If this is going to end up being one fairly small C file implementing
>> a spec that is not a moving target, I'd vote against depending on an
>> external library instead, no matter how spiffy and license-compatible
>> the external library might be.

> My understanding is that it's possible to include (fork) a MIT or BSD
> source code into our source tree, right? (Some other licenses certainly
> apply too).

MIT or 2-clause BSD would be ok for such a thing, other licenses
probably not.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to