On 31 March 2010 15:45, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> could not accept connection from the standby because max_wal_senders > is 0 > > > >> Well, that might still leave someone confused if they had one standby > >> and were trying to bring up a second one. > > > > I'd suggest something like "number of requested standby connections > > exceeds max_wal_senders (currently %d)" > > Oh, that's much better than anything I thought of. +1. > > ...Robert > > That provides more explicit information. :)
sr_error_message_v2.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
