On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> When there is a specific reject rule, why does the server say >> FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry > > It's intentional. We try to expose the minimum amount of knowledge > about the contents of pg_hba.conf to potential attackers.
The problem with the message is not that it's uninformative, but that it's counterfactual. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
