On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you could shut it down at the first point at which it is > holding no locks, rather than letting it continue recovering and > potentially retake some new locks. That would be more consistent with > the general idea of what a smart shutdown is supposed to be about. I > think the real question is whether it's worth the code complexity.
I don't think it's worth. So I agree to just remove the TODO item: "Redefine smart shutdown in standby mode to exist as soon as all read-only connections are gone." http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Standby_server_mode Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
