On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 22:12 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > Simon Riggs wrote: >> > > >> > > How about we call it "exclusivity constraints". >> > > >> > > Not much of a change, but helps to differentiate. >> > >> > Well, the keyword is EXCLUDE so we could call it "EXCLUDE contraints". >> >> If that is the keyword then that is what people will use, agreed. >> >> That is poor English, but I think we can reword the sentences to allow >> that phrase to make sense. >> >> e.g. Added capability for EXCLUDE constraints. > > I have modified the documentation with the attached patch to call this > new features "exclude constraints". Is this what everyone wants?
I don't think we should be changing this without input from a lot more people. We had a very, very long dicussion of this when this was initially under development. Changing it now seems like a good way to reopen a can of worms. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
