On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> >> [This is an open item for 9.0, hence the response to an apparently old >> >> hackers thread] >> >> > Thanks for the reply; 9.0 open item removed. >> >> I think you misread his reply. Please put that back. > > OK, I re-read it and still don't understand, but I don't have to.
I re-read it too and I don't understand either. This is LISTED as an open item for 9.0, but it is apparently not a new regression, so I think we should move it to the Todo list instead. This problem was discovered six months ago, is not a new regression, and there is apparently no movement toward a fix, so it doesn't make sense to me that we should hold up either 9.0 beta or 9.0 final on account of it. Or am I confused? ....Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
