On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Here's the fine patch. The actual code changes are simple and seem to
>> work as expected, but I struggled a bit with the phrasing of the
>> messages. Feel free to suggest improvements.
>
> Stick with the original wording? I don't really see a need to change it.
How about?:
if ((!am_superuser || am_walsender) &&
ReservedBackends > 0 &&
!HaveNFreeProcs(ReservedBackends))
{
if (am_walsender)
ereport(FATAL,
(errcode(ERRCODE_TOO_MANY_CONNECTIONS),
errmsg("remaining connection slots are reserved for
non-replication superuser connections")));
else
ereport(FATAL,
(errcode(ERRCODE_TOO_MANY_CONNECTIONS),
errmsg("connection limit exceeded for
non-superusers")));
}
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
