On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Here's the fine patch. The actual code changes are simple and seem to >> work as expected, but I struggled a bit with the phrasing of the >> messages. Feel free to suggest improvements. > > Stick with the original wording? I don't really see a need to change it.
I don't think that's a good idea. If we just say that the remaining connection slots are for superusers, someone will inevitably ask us why their superuser replication can't connect. I think it's important to phrase things as accurately as possible. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
