Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> So my proposal would be: >> >> wal_mode=crash/archive/standby >> archive_mode=on/off # if on, wal_mode must be >= 'archive' >> archive_command='command' >> max_wal_senders=<integer> # if > 0, wal_mode must be >= 'archive'
> As a general design comment, I think we should avoid still having an > archive_mode GUC but having it do something different. If we're going > to change the semantics, we should also change the name, maybe to > "archiving". Agreed on the general point, but AFAICS that proposal keeps the meaning of archive_mode the same as it was. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers