Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Agreed on the general point, but AFAICS that proposal keeps the meaning >> of archive_mode the same as it was.
> Well, clearly it doesn't. Someone who thinks they can simply turn > archive_mode=on and set archive_command is going to be sadly > disappointed. Well, there is another variable that they'll have to adjust as well, but ISTM that archive_mode still does what it did before, ie, determine whether we attempt to archive WAL segments. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers