Tom Lane wrote: > If so, master/standby would probably work. +1 for master/standby.
It's worth remembering that a "standby server" might not be actively connected to a master server. A server that's reading WAL from an archive backup, for example, can be put to standby mode. "Standby" covers that case too, better than "slave". -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
