Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > Now that it only targets the packaged version, I can do with a single
> > shared object, but maybe it needs to be more generic, like
> > pg_upgrade_tools.so or something like that.
> 
> +1 for pg_upgrade_tools or pg_upgrade_support or some such name.

I like 'pg_upgrade_support'.  I could also do 'pg_upgrade_funcs'.

> > I realize we need a separate pgxs makefile for the executable and shared
> > libraries.  My question was whether the shared library directory should
> > be under /contrib or under /contrib/pg_upgrade.
> 
> It has to be directly under /contrib, because the MSVC build scripts
> only look there for contrib modules to build.

OK.  Should I get started?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to