On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> postmaster.c contains the following comment just above the definition >> of PMState. It appears to be out of date: >> >> * After reaching a consistent point in WAL redo, startup process signals >> * us again, and we switch to PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT state. There's currently >> * no difference between PM_RECOVERY and PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT, but we >> * could start accepting connections to perform read-only queries at this >> * point, if we had the infrastructure to do that. > > But the first sentence of the above seems to be correct and helpful. No?
Yes. I was just quoting the whole thing for context. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
