On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >>> This would be OK as long as we document it well. We patched the >>> shutdown the way we did specifically because Fujii thought it would be >>> an easy fix; if it's complicated, we should revert it and document the >>> issue for DBAs. >> >> I don't understand this comment. > > In other words, I'm saying that it's not critical that we troubleshoot > this for 9.0. Revering Fujii's patch, if it's not working, is an option.
There is no patch which we could revert to fix this, by Fujii Masao or anyone else. The patch he proposed has not been committed. I am still studying the problem to try to figure out where to go with it. We could decide to punt the whole thing for 9.1, but I'd like to understand what the options are before we make that decision. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
