Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Is it reasonable to fix this now, and if so should I bump catversion >> or leave it alone? Â My own preference is to fix it in pg_proc.h but >> not touch catversion; but you could argue that different ways.
> are you planning to backpatch this? I wasn't planning to; as you say, without field complaints it doesn't seem compelling to fix in existing releases. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers