Jaime Casanova <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is it reasonable to fix this now, and if so should I bump catversion
>> or leave it alone? Â My own preference is to fix it in pg_proc.h but
>> not touch catversion; but you could argue that different ways.
> are you planning to backpatch this?
I wasn't planning to; as you say, without field complaints it doesn't
seem compelling to fix in existing releases.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
