On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 19:12 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hmm, OK, I think that makes sense. Would you care to propose a patch? >> > >> > Yep. Here is the patch. >> > >> > This patch distinguishes normal shutdown from unexpected exit, while the >> > server is in recovery. That is, when smart or fast shutdown is requested >> > during recovery, the bgwriter sets the ControlFile->state to new-introduced >> > DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY state. >> >> This patch is worth applying for 9.0? If not, I'll add it into >> the next CF for 9.1. > > Presumably Robert will be applying the patch? It seems to address the > concern raised on the thread.
Yes, I was planning to review it. But if you or someone else would like to cut in, that's OK too. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers