On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:27 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> wrote: > On May 27, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> I think we should fix it now. Quick thought: maybe we could use FOR >>> instead of AS: select myfunc(7 for a, 6 for b); >> >> I'm afraid FOR doesn't work either; it'll create a conflict with the >> spec-defined SUBSTRING(x FOR y) syntax. > > How about "ISPARAMVALUEFOR"? That shouldn't conflict with anything.
Or we could use the Finnish word epäjärjestelmällistyttämättömyydellänsäkäänköhän, which I'm pretty sure is not currently used in our grammar. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
