On Sunday 30 May 2010 18:43:12 Greg Stark wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> wrote: > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> I read through that thread and couldn't find much discussion of > >> alternative CRC implementations --- we spent all our time on arguing > >> about whether we needed 64-bit CRC or not. > > > > Alright, how about this thread? > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general/71741 > > Huh, actually apparently this is right about on schedule for > reconsidering this topic: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general/71903 Oh, and the first zlib version sporting the 4 separate shifted tables approach was 1.2.0 (9 March 2003) ;-)
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
