Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We do have on_shmem_exit and on_proc_exit function call queues. Seems > > we will need SET to create a queue of function calls containing previous > > values of variables SEt in multi-statement transactions. If we execute > > the queue in last-in-first-out order, the variables will be restored > > properly. > > That's most certainly the hard way. I was planning to just make GUC > save a spare copy of the start-of-transaction value of each variable.
Ewe, I was hoping for something with zero overhead for the non-SET case. Can we trigger the save for the first SET in the transaction? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
