Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ewe, I was hoping for something with zero overhead for the non-SET case. > > Well, a function call and immediate return if no SET has been executed > in the current xact seems low enough overhead to me. We'll just keep > a flag showing whether there's anything to do.
Oh, I thought you were going to save all the GUC variables on transaction start. I now assume you are going to have one field per variable for the pre-xact value. That is fine. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
