On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> It means that we can't prevent people from configuring their tools to >>> ignore important warning. We can't prevent them rom ignoring ERROR or >>> FATAL either... > >> My point is that most tools are going to look at the tag first to >> determine the severity of the message, and might even have >> log_min_messages set to ignore warnings. > > Why is this discussion based on the idea that we have to cater to > incorrectly written log-filtering apps? > > The correct log level for this message is LOG. End of discussion.
Why? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
