On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 11:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > >> Should I be downgrading Hot Standby breakages to LOG? That will > >> certainly help high availability as well. > > > > If a message is being issued in a non-user-connected session, there > > is basically not a lot of point in WARNING or below. It should either > > be LOG, or ERROR/FATAL/PANIC (which are probably all about the same > > thing in the startup process...) > > I think Simon's point here is the same as mine - LOG isn't too high - > it's too low.
Yes, *and* how do we decide which this is? Should I downgrade all of my code to throwing LOGs rather than ERRORs, because (following the same argument) doing so would be better for high availability? It's not a facetious question. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
