Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> The correct log level for this message is LOG. ?End of discussion. > > > Why? > > Because it's not being issued in a user's session. The only place it > can go is to the system log, and if you use a level of WARNING or less, > it's likely to get filtered out by log_min_messages. > > I'm totally unimpressed by the argument that log-filtering applications > don't know enough to pay attention to LOG messages. There are already a > lot of those that are quite important to notice.
My point was that log filtering applications might ignore WARNING. They don't usually ignore LOG. 8 -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
