Bruce Momjian wrote: > > OK, we have three possibilities: > > o All SETs are honored in an aborted transaction > o No SETs are honored in an aborted transaction > o Some SETs are honored in an aborted transaction (current) > > I think the problem is our current behavior. I don't think anyone can > say our it is correct (only honor SET before the transaction reaches > abort state). Whether we want the first or second is the issue, I think.
I think the current state is not that bad at least is better than the first. I don't think it's a *should be* kind of thing and we shouldn't stick to it any longer. regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
