Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > OK, we have three possibilities: > > > > > > o All SETs are honored in an aborted transaction > > > o No SETs are honored in an aborted transaction > > > o Some SETs are honored in an aborted transaction (current) > > > > > > I think the problem is our current behavior. I don't think anyone can > > > say our it is correct (only honor SET before the transaction reaches > > > abort state). Whether we want the first or second is the issue, I think. > > > > I think the current state is not that bad at least > > is better than the first. > > Oops does the first mean rolling back the variables on abort ? > If so I made a mistake. The current is better than the second.
The second means all SET's are rolled back on abort. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
