On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> Well, do you consider 7/8 to be mid-July or "close to the beginning"? > >> 7/8 would be about the last date I'd consider reasonable, given a CF >> starting 7/15. I would prefer a few days earlier, but I'm not sure >> how much of a vote I get considering that I'm not actively involved in >> the release process or the packaging of installers. > > It would be better not to branch until we're certain we won't need to > re-wrap the beta. I'm wondering why you see a need for any daylight at > all between the branch date and the start of the CF.
Well, I guess it isn't technically necessary, but I think it might make things less hectic. Last year we had two weeks, which was more than we needed, but I think a little slack time will make things go more smoothly. BTW, if we're going to do a second pgindent run for this release, we probably want to do that before the branch point. Not sure if it should be done before or after beta3. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
