On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >>> So this is not something we want fixed for 9.0, as indicated by Simon? >>> I don't see the patch on the commit-fest page yet. > >> I tend to think we should fix it for 9.0, but could be talked out of >> it if someone has a compelling argument to make. > > Er, maybe I lost count, but I thought you were the one objecting to > the patch.
No, I just wasn't sure whether it was safe. If it's safe, I'm 100% in favor of applying it and back-patching. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
