On Jun 11, 2010, at 5:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Jim Nasby <j...@nasby.net> wrote: >>> So there's no way to see if a particular privilege has been granted to >>> public. ISTM 'public' should be accepted, since you can't use it as a role >>> name anyway... > >> It's a bit sticky - you could make that work for >> has_table_privilege(name, oid, text) or has_table_privilege(name, >> text, text), but what would you do about the versions whose first >> argument is an oid? > > Nothing. The only reason to use those forms is in a join against > pg_authid, and the "public" group doesn't have an entry there.
Cool, I'll have CMD come up with a patch. -- Jim "Decibel!" Nasby jna...@enovafinancial.com Primary: 512-579-9024 Backup: 512-569-9461 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
