On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel. >>> (And there was much rejoicing.) > >> /me opens a beer. > >> How long should I wait before I start breaking things? > > Did you have any particular breakage in mind? > > I'm hesitant to have a whole lot of variance between REL9_0_STABLE and > HEAD just yet, since we'll surely be doing a lot of double-patching for > awhile. Localized patches, no problem, but this might not be the best > time to s/foo/bar/g or something like that.
Well, you can see for yourself what I've submitted for the next CF. As those things get reviewed, I'd like to get them committed; many of them need follow-on patches in which I don't want to invest too much effort until the initial patches go in. And then, too, other people have also submitted patches which I will be working on also. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
