Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie jul 09 12:16:42 -0400 2010:
>> If anybody feels really uncomfortable with that, we could add a
>> compensating "Assert(IsBinaryCoercible(ARR_ELEMTYPE(statarray),
>> atttype))" into get_attstatsslot(). Not sure if it's worth the cycles.
> Cycles spent only in assert-enabled builds? Why not?
I decided not to do it, not so much because of any performance worries
as that I didn't want to make lsyscache.c depend on the parser. Maybe
sometime we should rethink where the parse_coerce.c functionality lives.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
