1;2401;0cOn Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 06:49:27PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie jul 09 12:16:42 -0400 2010: > > > If anybody feels really uncomfortable with that, we could add a > > compensating "Assert(IsBinaryCoercible(ARR_ELEMTYPE(statarray), > > atttype))" into get_attstatsslot(). Not sure if it's worth the cycles. > Cycles spent only in assert-enabled builds? Why not? The slower assert-enabled is, the less likely it is that somebody can run serious testing on it - potentially catching bugs way much easier. Contrarily to your statement I would actually like to remove some older asserts. For example AtEOXact_Buffers makes it significantly expensive to do assert tests on larger shbuf setups.
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
