On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:58:01 +0900 "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > I'm not sure I believe Hannu's numbers, but in any case they're fairly > > irrelevant to the argument about whether a special protocol is useful. > > He wasn't testing textually-long queries, but rather the planning > > overhead, which is more or less independent of the length of any literal > > constants involved (especially if they're not part of the WHERE clause). > > Saving query plans via PREPARE seems quite sufficient, and appropriate, > > to tackle the planner-overhead issue. > > Just a confirmation. > Someone is working on PREPARE/EXECUTE ? > What about Karel's work ?
I am. My work is based on Karel's stuff -- at the moment I'm still basically working on getting Karel's patch to play nicely with current sources; once that's done I'll be addressing whatever issues are stopping the code from getting into CVS. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
