On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 18:16 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 11:55 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > > >> Having said that, I want to urge that we spend a suitable amount > > >> of time and thought and care designing this, lest it turn into a > > >> mess. I have no interest in slamming something through without > > >> adequate consideration. > > > > > > It's OK, I wasn't asking you or anyone else to do this. > > > > I don't think a mess is OK regardless of who makes it. I think it > > would be wise to try to get some sort of consensus on what it would > > look like, rough as that process is. > > So starting a discussion thread is the wrong way to achieve that? How > would you have me gain consensus if not this way?
I think you guys are talking past each other. I believe Kevin was in fact stating that we needed to continue discussion. Joshua D. Drake > > -- > Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services > > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
