On Jul 16, 2010, at 2:27 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > If we continue with the approach I took, we should implement the suggestion > to create a new data type for this in 9.1. That would be more waterproof than > the changes I made, if we introduce new ways to call functions in the future.
The downside is that it might cause the approach used in the older releases to get less testing. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
