Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > On fre, 2010-07-16 at 14:13 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote: >> Should we put some externally managed languages , like pl/proxy also in >> pgtemplate, so that CREATE LANGUAGE would work on them ?
> This has been rejected several times before. See: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg00050.php Note that there's nothing stopping a DBA from putting new entries in pg_pltemplate within his installation. Peter's points are valid reasons why we should be wary of putting entries into our distribution --- it's hard to control this sort of stuff over the timescale of a PG major release. But per-installation it doesn't seem unreasonable. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
