Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie jul 16 12:49:25 -0400 2010: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > On fre, 2010-07-16 at 14:13 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote: > >> Should we put some externally managed languages , like pl/proxy also in > >> pgtemplate, so that CREATE LANGUAGE would work on them ? > > > This has been rejected several times before. See: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg00050.php > > Note that there's nothing stopping a DBA from putting new entries in > pg_pltemplate within his installation. Peter's points are valid reasons > why we should be wary of putting entries into our distribution --- it's > hard to control this sort of stuff over the timescale of a PG major > release. But per-installation it doesn't seem unreasonable.
Since a week ago, PL/php ships a small install.sql script that adds a pg_pltemplate entry. This seems easy enough for the DBA. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
