"Greg Sabino Mullane" <g...@turnstep.com> writes:
> No: there is only a small number of words that we go back through,
> so the above will not work as we cannot get back to the name of the table
> from the right side of the AND. The way to fix that is to redesign our
> tab-completion system such that it knows about a greater number of words,
> perhaps even the complete statement.
Yeah, tab_complete.c is really a pretty awful kluge. One thing that
might be interesting is to make it use psql's lexer, which I think
wasn't there at all when the completion code was started. But that just
takes care of word-recognition issues, it won't do anything at the
semantic level. I hesitate to think of trying to incorporate the
backend grammar too :-(
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
