On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> we gain something quite specific and tangible, namely, the >> expectation that patch authors will stay on top of their patches >> if they want them reviewed by the community. > > Barring some operational emergency here, I'll be reviewing the > status of all the open patches in the CF today. If I can't find any > new posting by the author for the patch in question, I'll mark it > Returned With Feedback. I'll probably be cracking the whip on a few > others, one way or another. If anyone wonders why I don't do so for > certain patches, it will probably be because I've had off-list > messages about needing more time to do a proper review or being in > transit and unable to do more than post short emails at the moment. > > I do request that all authors and reviewers make an effort to keep > the CF app page up-to-date. If you're not sure all recent patches, > reviews, and significant comment posts are reflected in the app for > a patch for which you're an author or reviewer, please check as soon > as possible and make it right; it's save time for me and will help > keep the process moving smoothly.
Thanks, I appreciate it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
