On lör, 2010-07-24 at 07:02 -0700, Ron Mayer wrote: > Instead of squashing every patch into a single commit, what if it got > squashed into a perhaps 3 separate commits -- one as submitted, one > as reviewed, and one as re-written by the committer. History stays > linear; and you keep the most relevant parts of the history, > while dropping all the development brainstorming commits.
But then there would be commits in the main repository that were known not good enough. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
