On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Well, that's pretty much saying we won't release before September. > > Yup, that's what I think. In fact I think September might be > optimistic. This is what happens when you fork early and allow > developers to start focusing on new development instead of testing > the release branch.
I call bullshit. The six items in the "code" section of the open items list were reported 14, 5, 5, 1, 27, and 0 days ago. The 27-day old item is purely cosmetic and there's absolutely zero evidence that Simon hasn't done it yet because he's been busy working on 9.1 development. It's much more likely that he hasn't gotten around to taking care of that (and his outstanding 9.1 patch) because he's been busy with everything else in his life other than pgsql-hackers. The remaining items have an average age of precisely 5 days, which hardly sounds like we've been sitting on our hands, especially when you consider that both you and Heikki have been on vacation for longer than that. And it's not as if I haven't been following those issues, either. Had you and Heikki and Peter fallen down a well more or less permanently, I would have patched about half of those bugs by now. The fact that I haven't done so is not because I'm busy working on 9.1 development, but because I respect your expertise and wish to have the benefit of it so as to reduce the chances that I will break things, or, for that matter, fix them in a way that's adequate but not the one you happen to prefer. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
